➢ Case Study 2 (100pts.)—due Unit 5 As professionals, we are often subjected to

➢ Case Study 2 (100pts.)—due Unit 5
As professionals, we are often subjected to dealing with ethical issues that can have legal implications.
Because of this, you are asked to critically think about how you would respond to particular situations
given. This serves as your midterm for this course. For Case Study 2, students will find a case study in
their own state and provide information about it. They will then give feedback as to whether or not they
agree with the outcome of the sanctions. For South Carolina students, you can find the needed information
by following these steps:
(1.) Go to llr.sc.gov/sw/
(2.) Scroll down and click on “Board Orders”
(3.) Scroll and find an order you would like to use and then click on “View Order”
Students will complete a 1-2 page paper including the ethical violation(s) in bold above and your response
below NOT in bold regarding your feelings about the case outcome.
You must include the information provided in the Board Order with the name and what occurred.
You must include a title page and references page with the NASW Code of Ethics cited (in APA 7th edition
format). The title page and references page should look similar to your Case Study 1.
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
a. Collect and organize data, and apply critical thinking to interpret information from clients and constituencies;
b. Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies;
c. Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies;
d. Select appropriate intervention strategies based on the assessment, research knowledge, and values and preferences of clients and constituencies.