Build a slide presentation of the hypothetical health promotion plan you develop

Build a slide presentation of the hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in the first assessment ( I WILL ATTACH MY FIRST ASSESSMENT BELOW)
Then, implement your health promotion plan by conducting a hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected group. How would you set goals for the session, evaluate session outcomes, and suggest possible revisions to improve future sessions?
i have already done this power point, here is the feed back that I am not proficient in can you PLEASE fix it.
feedback #1:
Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Your Result:
NON-PERFORMANCE
Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Faculty Comments:
I did not see this area of the scoring guide addressed in the assessment. To improve your designation in this criterion please refer to the assessment rubric so that all the criteria are addressed. It is easy to miss a criterion at times.
feed back #2
Evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Your Result:
NON-PERFORMANCE
Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Faculty Comments:
I did not see this area of the scoring guide addressed in the assessment. In order to improve your designation in this criterion please refer to the assessment rubric so that all of the criteria are addressed. It is easy to miss a criterion at times. In order to receive a distinguished designation in this criterion, you needed to evaluate the outcomes and the attainment of health goals for your hypothetical participant(s). This evaluation signifies the degree to which the session was successful and whether revisions would be needed for future presentations. Was your session successful? Does it need revisions?
I will attach my power point, speaker notes, AND my assessment 1 from this course
SCORING GUIDE : THIS WILL TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT WITH THE FEEDBACK #1 AND FEEDBACK #2 THAT I LISTED ABOVE.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Expand All
Criterion 1
Present a health promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group within a community.
Distinguished
Presents a professional, evidence-based, and engaging PowerPoint presentation. The plan is based on specific, identified health needs and goals, and is well supported by error-free slides that enhance key points and adhere to visual design best practices. The audio and speaker notes of the details of the educational session were clear and appropriate for the hypothetical audience.
Proficient
Presents a health promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group within a community. Slides enhance key points and adhere to visual design best practices, but no audio and/or speaker notes.
Basic
Presents a health promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group with a community that lacks clear purpose, coherence, or focus, or is supported by slides that add little value to the presentation, exhibit poor design, are hard to read, or include distracting slide transitions, animations, or graphics.
Non Performance
Does not present a health promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group within a community.
Criterion 2
Evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Distinguished
Evaluates educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational sessions.
Proficient
Evaluates educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Basic
Evaluates educational session outcomes and the attainment of health goals without collaborating with hypothetical participants.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.
Criterion 3
Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Distinguished
Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.
Proficient
Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Basic
Evaluates educational session outcomes unrelated to progress toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.
Criterion 4
Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Distinguished
Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Proficient
Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Basic
Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, and/or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Non Performance
Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Sources are not relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years).
Criterion 5
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
Distinguished
Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
Proficient
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
Basic
Slides are easy to read and error free. No audio or audio is not clear, difficult to hear, or not professionally presented. Transcript and speaker notes are sufficient support for the slides.
Non Performance
Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No audio, transcript, and/or speaker notes provided.
WalkMe
Chat