For this assessment, you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection that address

For this assessment, you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.
If you do not see the assessment instructions on this page, try refreshing this web page in your browser.
If your instructions do not load after a refresh, please reach out to Learner Technical Support.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Expand All
Criterion 1
Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
Distinguished Reflects on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes. Includes ways in which reflective nursing practice can help build a better understanding of past experiences to improve future practice decisions.
ProficientReflects on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
BasicDescribes an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, but the reflection on the success or failure to achieve desired outcomes is missing or unclear.
Non PerformanceDoes not describe an interdisciplinary collaboration experience.
Criterion 2
Identify ways poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, supported by evidence from the literature.
Distinguished Identifies how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Proficient Identifies how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature. 
Basic Identifies poor collaboration, but does not address how it can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources or does not provide supporting evidence from the literature.
Non Performance Does not Identify ways poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources.
Criterion 3
Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.
Distinguished Identifies best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Proficient Identifies best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals. 
Basic Identifies leadership strategies, but it is unclear how they would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, or does not provide supporting evidence from the literature.
Non Performance Does not identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.
Criterion 4
Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.
Distinguished Identifies best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Proficient Identifies best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.
Basic Identifies interdisciplinary collaboration strategies, but it is unclear how they would help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively together.
Non Performance Does not identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.
Criterion 5
Communicate via video with clear sound and light.DistinguishedCommunicates via video with clear sound and light. Content delivery is focused, smooth, and well-rehearsed.ProficientCommunicates via video with clear sound and light.BasicDoes not communicate via video or video is difficult to hear and see.Non PerformanceDoes not communicate professionally in a well-organized presentation.
Criterion 6
The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Distinguished The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting flawless adherence to APA format.
Proficient The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Basic A majority of reference list sources are relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years) submitted with few APA errors.
Non Performance Does not provide a reference list of relevant and/or evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).